Max Beckman, Dream
of Monte Carlo,
1940-43,
oil on canvas,
c. 62 x 79 in.
Staatgalerie
Stuttgart.
Jasper Johns, Diver,
1962, oil on canvas
with objects.
Collection Norman and
Irma Braman.
Nan Goldin, Joey
at the Love Ball,
New York City, 1991.
Philip Guston,
Painter's Forms II,
1978, oil on canvas,
75 x 108 in.
Gerhard Richter,
829-5 Abstract
Painting, 1995,
oil on linen,
20 x 28 in.
Matthew Ritchie,
Trouble in Mind,
1996, oil, marker
on canvas,
92 x 120 in.
Jane Fine, Rex,
1996, oil on
canvas,
25 x 25 in.
Lisa Yuskavage,
Hamass, 1996,
oil on canvas
board, 6 x 8 in.
Brad Kahlhamer,
Raven, 1996,
oil on canvas,
16 x 14 in.
|
servetar selects
by Stuart Servetar
"Max Beckmann in Exile"
at the Guggenheim Museum Soho
Oct 9, 1996-Jan. 5, 1997
The exhibition occupies the ground floor of
the museum, and that's more than enough
given the intensity of the work. It's hard
to recall any other time we've had the
opportunity to see so many of the triptychs
(seven of nine) in one space, and supported
by so many stellar anciliary easel works.
Trying to identify Beckmann's cast of
characters accidentally leads into a sort
of (Bob) Dylanesque reverie of free-form
prose poetry. King with green face, dead
already, singing what opera to gypsy girl
in pink with mask, for Beckmann's Actors
(1941-42). Contortionist kissing salmon-
tighted tumbler while crone with fish lies
on net below, hope goes underground, in
Acrobats (1939). You can go as deeply into
Beckmann's iconography as you like (the
triptych from his childhood holds a good
deal of clues), or you can just savor the
rich color and surfaces he created. Though
all his works are clearly stamped with his
motifs and signature black lines, they vary
more widely than you might expect, moving
back and forth from the more or less
graphic to the rendered and creamy. Do not
miss this show.
"Jasper Johns: A Retrospective"
at the Museum of Modern Art
Oct. 20, 1996-Jan. 21, 1997
While it is difficult to actually see
Johns' works--they are so lauded and
anthologized that they have become the very
icons he strove to undermine--looking is
well worth the effort. Do homage to his
early flags, maps and number and word
paintings and try to stick it out through
the rest of his canon. All the works
display Johns' dogged insistence on
retaining the neither/nor strategy he first
adopted with the "Flag" series ("I want the
work to be neither flag nor picture").
Subsequent works were neither collages,
patterns, fields nor pictoral quotes, and
are best exemplified by Johns' affection
for those Psych 101 drawings that can look
like either a portrait of young woman or an
old hag, etc. Almost all the works are done
in encaustic, a wax-based medium capable of
deftly sucking the life out of any color.
Ultimately all this non-ism and the
increasing self-anthologizing to which
Johns has been prone makes the viewer want
to flee out of the basement and upstairs to
the prints, a medium in which the artist
seems far more comfortable and giving. It
is worthwhile to hang in as long as
possible, however, if only to wrestle with
a difficult, stand-alone kind of mind,
which, for better or worse, has influenced
the course of painting for the past 40
years.
Nan Goldin, "I'll Be Your Mirror"
at the Whitney Museum of American Art
Oct. 3, 1996-Jan. 5, 1997
Goldin follows in the tradition of artists
who record--and glamorize--their respective
coteries, a practice that in the modern era
extends from Weimar Berlin to Paris in the
`20s on to Haight-Ashbury and back home to
New York City. Goldin gives us the Lower
East Side, Berlin and Tokyo from the late
`70s on and, like the musical Rent, brings
it back in vivid color for the folks in the
'burbs. That she faithfully and lovingly
records the lives of her "family" is a
mission well worth following. That she has
chosen to add wall labels with details
about the lives of the people she
photographed, most prominently herself, is
tolerable. But that she chose to write
commentaries on her own work is less
forgivable. Her pictures ably tell their
own stories, and her trite writings just
create so much distraction, intruding
everywhere along the walls.
Philip Guston, "Major Paintings
from the `70s" at McKee
Oct. 5-Nov. 9, 1996
These 11 works from 1970-1979 continue to
hold up. If nothing else they are studies
in assuredness and imagination, successful
on so many levels. Guston is as deft with
his content as with his paint, which he
mastered through all those years of making
pretty abstracts. He does not slip into
polemics as he so easily could when he
taking on characters like the hooded
Klansman. Nor does he fritter away into
obscurantism. Guston's least defined work
in the show, Arena (1979), is not merely
arch or cryptic as it is confidently
inventive. Arena could be an overhead shot
of a studio, or a painting of a painting.
It could also be seen as an art-making
machine, a clever visual pun on the
practice of cranking out abstract
paintings. Who knows? Who cares? Anybody
who looks at them.
Gerhard Richter
at Marian Goodman
Oct. 18-Nov. 30, 1996
Every inch of the ever-helpful Marian
Goodman gallery has been hung with
Richter's three-dozen abstract paintings,
done for the most part in 1995, plus a few
older photo-based landscapes and portraits
in the back room. Perhaps Richter gets away
with making simple, assured, flat-out
gorgeous abstract paintings because he's
German and perforce will always be taken
seriously. Good for him. Over soft, photo-
inspired backgrounds, Richter pulls paint
alternately horizontally and vertically.
The overall effect is one of very pure
process paintings with beautiful moments of
paint bleeding, blending and peeking
through to other layers. The bleeds and
blurs often resolve into faint landscapes
that have a lot of Kaspar David Friedrich
in them, natürlich. By sheer number and
uniform scale, however, the work never gets
too far from the mediated, mechanical image
with which Richter has always been smitten.
These pieces bring to mind unresolved
Polaroids and scanned prints. In the small
back room, there are two portraits of his
daughter which are hauntingly Vermeer-like
and a few landscapes that spread a few
sparks of Corot just in time for that artist's
show at the Metropolitan Museum.
Matthew Ritchie, "The Hard Way"
at Basilico Fine Arts
Oct. 19-Nov. 23, 1996
A real crowd-pleaser with something for
everyone, this show celebrates intelligence
in the service of something other than
fashionable critiques. The work tackles
nothing short of the universe and how it
got made, how the ripples of the Big Bang
got twisted and colored into shapes and
characters and best of all, paint. For this
show, based on the life cycles of the
earth's seven Watchers (Fantastic Four fans
take note), Ritchie has continued to make
flat shapes with a satin surface in a
beautiful palette that is bright but far
from candy. The shapes, which like
everything in his project have their own
logos, are either cut in plastic, drawn on
the wall or rendered in paint. This time
around, Ritchie has eased up on his
handling, submerged his schematic Magic
Marker drawings and given up the safety of
always floating his constructs against a
gray ground. In Trouble in Mind, an epic
totality, he has even dared to anchor his
work against a horizon: make landscapes and
be damned. Think what you will of
multivalent myth-making in the style of
Mircea Eliade and Joseph Campbell, it has
gotten Ritchie this far and we're the
better for it.
Jane Fine
at Casey Kaplan
Oct. 11-Nov. 9, 1996
In this the month of the painter, Jane Fine
has also put up her second solo show. While
Ritchie's universe seems to be expanding,
Fine's seems to be congealing. Formerly,
Fine used her expert hand to create large
expanses of cartoon smoke out of which
popped the odd duck foot and other forms.
Now she has furthered another strand of her
work, one which features machine-like
forms, toy tanks or drill presses. She
resists fully defining her forms, choosing
instead to break into them with rectanges
of paint that read like cartoon bandages.
Her colors, always high key, have taken on
a plastic skin and at times are downright
shrill. Only Rex, which features a flat
plane of pale green paint cutting back into
a red zone of color, begins to add some
suck to the overall pop of her paintings.
Lisa Yuskavage
at Boesky & Callery
Through Nov. 16, 1996
Yuskavage is one of a handful of painters
who have recently rediscovered the joys of
heavy glaze painting. And like many of
them, she has yet to learn that making
glazes does not mean having to use varnish
by the gallon. As far as the content of her
work goes, you might say, while some
artists tinkle on the keys of the old grand
thematic piano, Yuskavage sits on them.
Which is not to fault her per se, subtlety
is not one of the hallmarks of our era
(though slightness might be). Her paintings
feature deformed female figures painted
from tiny plaster models that are also on
view. The figures' deformity lies strictly
in the nose, tits and ass department which
makes them, um, you know, statements. Only
the suite of three paintings hung to
suggest a triptych, including Motherfucker
Rocker and Feminist Husband, begins to hint
at deeper wells of emotions being drawn
upon.
Brad Kahlhamer
at Bronwyn Keenan
Oct. 12-Nov. 16, 1996
Kahlhamer is a hunter/fisherman, a
collector of lures and a person who is not
unfamiliar with decoys. His paintings
follow suit. At first glance they read like
swatches of large goopy abstract
expressionist paintings. Often, however,
they resolve into landscapes and other
scenes derived directly from memories of
that large land mass due west of Manhattan.
Furthermore, though many artists have
adopted comic book stylings into their
work, Kahlamer is one of the few who
actually worked in the comics field. What
he took out of it is far more subtle and
internalized than what we usually get. Atop
his abstracted vistas and bark-like
surfaces, Kahlamer scrawls captions and
stick figures with a sign painter's brush.
Once we read the final overlay we realize,
for example, that that group of smiley
faces scumbled over thick strokes of paint
is really Mt. Rushmore as the artist saw it
as a child, zipping by in a car at 50 mph.
It is a welcome sight to see an artist who
has worked with installation, video and
Garbage Pail Kids, standing solidly on both
feet to make paintings that are
simultaneously lush, smart and funny.
STUART SERVETAR is a New York painter and
critic.
|