Cheryl Comstock
If Ever the Lid Gets
Off My Head, 1995
Claudia Fitch
Mannequin Head #5, 1996
Installation at
Crockett Rodeo,
from left: George Raggett,
Night Light-blue
(1996-97);
Darrin Little,
Fortress, 1996
(foreground); and
George Raggett, The
Puddle (1996-97)
Hung Tran
Cindy, 1995-97
Jeffrey Mitchell,
Jesus, in the Garden,
1997
Jeffrey Mitchell,
Hello, I'm Sorry,
1997
Sebastian Rodriguez
Funeral of a Miner
Killed in an Accident,
c. 1928
Suzan Frecon
Unexplained,
1993
Denzil Hurley
NB 9, 1992-96
Robert C. Jones
Balcony,
1993
|
the seattle
scene
by Marilu Knode
In what local broadcasters are calling our
"Holiday Blast"--almost two feet of snow in
as many days--I wonder which was worse: the
cabin fever that overcame me after spending
a half day inside, or the fact that my
neighborhood brew pub ran out of beer? The
snow and subsequent rain damaged G. Gibson
Gallery, forcing it to close the back room
for renovation. And Greg Kucera gallery
posted pictures of the water damage that
destroyed an estimated five percent of its
inventory, but the space was cleaned up
sufficiently to mount January shows.
FITCH AND COMSTOCK AT KUCERA
The first show of the year at Kucera
featured works by Seattle artists Claudia
Fitch and Cheryl Comstock. A not-so-sly
feminist tingle resonates in this pairing.
Comstock's layered, confection-like
paintings begin with a subtly penciled grid
that is then covered by snowflake doilies
delicately sprinkled with little pearls.
Cartoon images, taken from vaguely
recognizable fairy tales, play out the main
message. I Felt the Wind Within Her (1995)
has a black line drawing of a little girl
sitting at a vanity, a large gray doll
house behind her. A slash of pink paint is
scribbled on her cheek, damaging this fairy
tale with a sour potion. In other works,
girls play with geese and chickens (animals
bred for human slaughter), and animals are
presented as childish stand-ins. (Bruno
Bettleheim's analyses based on Freudian
horrors come to mind.) Comstock uses a
deconstructive, disjunctive layering to
orchestrate her obsessive yet crisp
camouflage decoration. This rescues the
work from well-trod and bloodless political
illustration, allowing her audience the
chance to play with the live wires of this
new, dangerous girlhood.
Claudia Fitch's baroque wall-mounted and
flocked steel sculptures, all from 1996,
simulate truncated store display mannequins
and bring to mind 1930s Surrealist
photography. Her transmogrification of the
female figure into fashionable cadavers
vivisected the female and the feminine,
both real and metaphoric. The acidic, pop
colors of the flocking dissemble the steel
structure beneath--the forms could be of
more malleable materials such as Styrofoam,
plaster, or sculpey--while the matteness of
the colors, from a canary yellow to a
deadened black, give little sensuous
pleasure to the viewer. The shifting
vistas, anecdotal passages and hard-edged
shadows cast from Fitch's hat armatures,
miniature toilet bowls or David Smith-esque
drawings-in-space play the real against
shadow, inside against out. The viewer is
set up for a shopping romp at Bergdorf's
and instead hits the wall of feminine
resistance.
CROCKETT RODEO OPENS
Seattle's newest gallery, Crockett Rodeo,
opened Jan. 3 with works by three young
artists--George Raggett, Darrin Little and
Hung Tran, all recent graduates from U.
Cal. Santa Barbara. Their works reflect
SoCal's funky, conceptual, beautiful anti-
art esthetic. Pragmatic rather than ironic,
they use traditional art-making genres such
as landscape, still life and portraiture,
but with a difference. This is the most
engaging and humorous group show I've seen
in Seattle, the work being satiric and
self-conscious without being self-
indulgent.
Raggett's low sculptures include a minature
golf hole with volcano The Puddle (1996-
97), which rises five inches off the floor
and is made with plaster, architectural
model flocking, Plexiglas and paint. This
miniature artificial wonder forces the
viewer to stoop down to marvel at its
fragility. An imperialist's dream, to
dominate and re-make nature in our own
image, from vicious volcano to destination
resort golf links. Night Light-blue (96-97)
is a plaster, bundt-cake form complete with
dribbled acrylic icing, with an ankle-high
night light that casts a blue moon glow.
This is a dreamy little alien scene, both
poignant and practical, the ghostly
illumination for the puddle before it.
Darrin Little's still life, hung in the
gallery entry/kitchen area, is a wooden
shelf with a mismatched group of crockery;
both sets of cup and saucers are impaled
with a red, green or yellow safety
reflector. This is a warning: don't use the
good china. Or is the bone china a stand-in
for the frailty of human beings? Little's
dry-wall medieval castle, a humorous do-it-
yourself war toy, is complete with
crenellations for pouring boiling oil, toy
knights with a wood stick battering ram,
and two rocket models hidden inside the
guard towers, ready for blast-off. Little's
third work has three components, all
focusing on the idea of shooting down a
World War I toy model airplane, with paper
pilot, from a sited location at the far
gallery space. History, action, landscape,
all combined in this little viewer
participation piece.
Hung Tran made the largest of the works in
the show, Cindy (1995-97), a shaggy hook
rug with slightly different colors of yarn
giving the work a slightly used look. The
floppy, amebic piece is wedged between two
walls, the rug confined and slumping.
Knowing that the work is named after Tran's
former girlfriend set my mind spinning: is
this her public area, stuck sensuously
between the legs of the space? Tran's five
small acrylic paintings, done on the wall
in the back room, show him in various poses
he strikes every morning, stretching and
reacting to the pains gained from every day
acts of living and working.
JEFFREY MITCHELL'S "TOMB OF REE MORTON"
Seattle artist Jeffrey Mitchell lived in
the Elliott Brown Gallery during the
holidays, producing (almost) all the works
for his show "The Tomb of Ree Morton."
Featured are a series of playful,
scatological plaster works, all made in
1997, where sculpted bunnies stand in for
Christ and his disciplines, their pudgy
little bodies and the polyp-like
environment of trees, pedestals and stools
all slyly suggesting how religious faith
was, in the past, so tied to nature. Christ
in Communion with the Mothership presents a
rapturous little white bunny looking up in
awe at an odd round beast whose two halves
are covered in bulbous extrusions. Each of
the plaster works, except a turtle shell
that has pink stripes on its up-ended
belly, are pure white plaster,
monochromatic essays whose maximal, messy
materials and content undermine a wish for
purity and calm. Evident in the bunnies'
stages are hints of bronze age decorative
motifs, and the Eastern three-part
hierarchy of earth, human and sky.
These narrative bunny cycles are joined by
a variety of objects in other materials
such as the deliberately sloppy drawing
Purity of....Something!, a botched but
sincere exercise in lettering whose
enthusiasm embraces the watercolor drips
and residual mistakes. Also in this
apologetic vein is Hello, I'm Sorry, two
plaster vases set on a low white pedestal
and filled with lovely pink and white
tulips languishing over the edges. I guess
if you added water for the flowers, the
vases would be destroyed. Rounding out
Mitchell's far-flung show are a floating
glassine ball, two pink cast-plastic bunny
sets, several very spare drawings
delicately colored with tenuous imagery,
some older Rorschach-like prints, and a
minimal floor construction based on the
Budweiser brewery in Newark, N.J.
The show is dedicated to `70s artist Ree
Morton, whose work also combined a wide
range of materials in socially gregarious
but disjointedly private installations.
Mitchell's works then are elegies--
mourning, leaving, teaching, apologizing--
recalling Minimalist process verbs like
throwing, drooping, sitting. If the show is
a "tomb," then what, or who, is buried
inside--Morton's ideals, or Mitchell
himself? Doesn't any artist bury themselves
in their objects for later veneration?
PHOTOS FROM PERU AND CHILE AT SEAFIRST
Seafirst Gallery is hosting two traveling
exhibitions "Visions of Modernity:
Photographs from the Peruvian Andes 1900-
1930," organized by Houston photographer
Peter Yenne and Peruvian curator Fernando
Castro, and "Traditional Arts and Trades of
Chile," organized by the Foto Cine Club of
Chile. The former is a museum-quality show
presenting known and obscure artists living
and working in Peru during the early part
of the century. All of the black-and-white
works, newly printed from vintage
negatives, convey--through their rich
tonalities, deep field of vision and
unselfconscious combination of old world
and new--a shifting place, its people in
transition and dealing with cataclysmic
changes from an industrialized outside.
Primary are commissioned portraits for the
newly prosperous, and various studio shots
of "types," reminiscent of August Sander.
Although the Peruvian content is
unfamiliar, the photograph's basic
capabilities render the images
recognizable.
Until recently Martn Chambi has been about
the only well-known Peruvian photographer.
His self-conscious Self-Portrait with
Negative Self-Portrait (1923) shows the
artist in a romantic pose gazing at a
negative of himself. Chambi's portrait of a
woman bullfighter subtly suggests that an
interest in feminism may arrived along with
modernist esthetics. First Airplane Over
Cuzco (1925) captures, from a bird's eye
vantage point, a populace arrested at the
sight of an airplane flying low over the
city's central square, whose two-story
buildings seem diminished by the invasion.
The view proclaims the preeminence of this
new soaring outside world, dwarfing the
pedestrians below. Chambi worked not to
present the contents of a colonialist's
territory but, with a critical and
sensitive eye, represented the issues and
people of his community.
Among those artists newly discovered are
the Vargas brothers, whose night scenes,
including Nocturne-Scene in an Atrium (c.
1930), are noirish, brooding images of a
city's shady nighttime denizens, where
shadows menace and fountains become the
curvaceous form of a forgotten lover. Their
Gallery of the Vargas Brothers Studio (c.
1920) is a photo of the studio, re-shot
with cut-outs of sitters from other prints.
The deep, three-dimensional room is skewed
by the two-dimensional cut-outs, providing
one of few deliberately surreal moments in
the show.
From Jos Gabriel Gonzalez's portrait of a
dead baby laid out on a table like a still
life, her eyes staring at the viewer, to
Avelino Ochoa's Two Women (1930), with a
nude woman sitting on the lap of a woman
dressed in drag, the photographs are
startlingly inventive. These photographers,
as well as Juan Manuel Figueroa-Aznar,
Crisanto & Filiberto Cabrera, Miguel Chani
and Sebastian Rodriguez, provide us with
images to fill in the gaps of our knowledge
of another part of the world, one captured
just as it was slipping away.
The second of the two exhibitions,
"Traditional Arts and Trades of Chile," is
less interesting for its straightforward
documentary photographic style (none of the
works are dated), although some images do
suggest how little some Chilean traditions
have changed in the past 100 years. Even
the nighttime color photograph of
firefighters and a building in flames
cannot compete with the strange
otherworldly presence of the images of
Peru. Here there is no struggle to retain
traditional culture (and perhaps its
values) in the shadow of cars, planes and
the fast pace of urbanization. Rather,
these seem more like anecdotal shots
commissioned by a chamber of commerce of
the people who make their country function.
ABSTRACTION RULES?
The Center on Contemporary Art's show
"square painting/plane painting," organized
by Lauri Chambers with Rhonda Howard,
presents abstract painting produced by
well- and lesser-known artists from around
the country. CoCA's space, handsomely
configured into discrete bays, was a bit
too densely installed. Thomas Nozkowski's
works, for instance, were hung on endcaps,
taking up the interstices that should have
given viewers some breathing room. The
installation itself moved from the hard-
edge abstraction of Paul Mogensen, Suzan
Frecon and Mary Henry, to more conceptual
and systems work by Denzil Hurley, to some
funky mixed medium works on cardboard by
Dan E. May; to the more expressive
paintings by Jacqueline Barnett and Robert
C. Jones. There is a definite generational
slant here; the youngest of the group,
Alfonse Borysewicz, was born in 1957. This
progressive movement made visual sense,
allowing the viewer to focus on broader
categories of abstract "style" without
suggesting equivalences in direction or
design.
In the press release Chambers states,
"These are not pictures, they are
paintings....There is no text which will
explain it," providing us with a clue that
Chambers seeks a purely visual response for
the work. And yet there arise traces of
architectural edifices, evidence and
metaphor of human obsession, hints of
spirituality and duress, and the
claustrophobia of society's strictures, all
divined through the viewer's human need to
find meaning. Abstraction was a mind-blower
at the beginning of the century, one so
daring that it continues to feed and
nourish artists, but it was an unfamiliar
vocabulary--where is the universality in
that? So, in fact, the viewer one way or
another brings in outside text, conjuring
rhyme and reason themselves, some gleaned
from personal experience, some from
ingesting the critical evaluation of
others. How can text, social or other, not
come into play with this work?
Is the title punning when it says the works
presented are "square," meaning not just
their geometric shape but their social
status? Are the works not just "plane"
(where meaning and surface stay squarely in
the two dimensions) but "plain," not fancy,
just doing my job ma'am? In posing this
descriptive title most of the works then
break it down in some way or another, by
introducing space, activity or figurative
references.
Suzan Frecon's tight, flat, architectural
works are appealing despite a rather
limited range of straight-edged
interlocking shapes. One piece, a deep sky
blue central field with an orange strip
running along the bottom, up the right
side, with a small dip into the main pool
of blue, might even be the most stylized
seascape ever--blue sky, beach, and wave
about to crash down. Frecon's references
touch upon `70s Minimalism, yet her teasing
a landscape out of abstraction recalls the
work of Robert Motherwell.
Denzil Hurley's systemic NB9 (1992-96),
consists of 36 small white canvases, either
a square or a rectangle, each with a
centered black square. As installed, in
alternating patterns of square and
rectangle, they line up to make one larger
work. Although using a predetermined
pattern, Hurley is still able to tease out
a dynamic visual experience; the viewer's
eyes trace back and forth to find the
irregularities in paint application, the
way the shadows perfectly fill in the space
between the works, or divine alleyways made
when the variably shaped works change
places. With an economy of means, Hurley
allows that mathematics and geometry are
the only type of universal language that
could inform our reading and bring the
works into dialogue with the outside world.
Like Hurley, Dan May too uses a grid
pattern in his Untitled (1994), in which a
deep cardboard box holds 13 rows of 8
envelopes, lined up on each side with black
hatch marks. The envelopes are lightly
washed in green, with a central transparent
white dot in their center. Each envelope
sports its own simple lines that suggest a
house, or a dog-earned roof line, a bridge,
a tightrope or a trap; even infinity came
to mind. Here, as with the artist's smaller
collages and paintings, a sense of
pictorial depth is avoided but references
are retained to the outside world, one
inhabited by bodies, and minds, and ideas.
Robert C. Jones's over-all strokes with
wrought iron forms that hold his garden-
like palette of yellow and blue in spatial
tension brings to mind certain, more
ascetic works by Matisse; the interlocking
forms and irregular black outlines release
the painting, and the viewer, from any
sense of urgency about the work. Jake
Berthot's works suggested Rothko's
abstraction, although without the scale and
glowing surfaces of a spiritual experience.
(But, as always, when organizing an
exhibition the work one receives may not be
the one that the curator most specifically
wanted; indeed, sometimes the artist's
inclusion is a sign, one set to bolster a
premise without illuminating specifics
about the artist's oeuvre.)
The most scumbled, dense and dramatic
works, by Jacqueline Barnett, have the
agitation of a Soutine without his implied
social commentary. Although it is unfair to
draw these parallels, generally one makes
such correspondences to push and tease out
some sense of continuity. In organizing
this show, the curators surely meant to
state that abstract painting is alive and
well; this statement would have been better
supported with the inclusion of a younger
generation or two of practicing artists.
MARILU KNODE is a Seattle curator. Her
email address is bennknode@earthlink.net.
|